Knowledge distillation - Fireworks AI Docs

Transfer knowledge from large teacher models to smaller, low-cost, more efficient student models while preserving performance. Knowledge distillation enables you to create compact models that maintain the reasoning capabilities of larger models. This tutorial demonstrates the complete workflow using GSM8K mathematical reasoning as our example task.

Technique	Teacher Model	Student Model	Primary Goal
Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT)	DeepSeek-V3 (685B)	Qwen2.5-7B	Format Learning & Structure
Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT)	N/A (Self-improvement)	Supervised Fine-Tuned Qwen2.5-7B	Accuracy Optimization

Qwen2.5-7B (52% accuracy) + DeepSeek-V3 knowledge → Optimized 7B model (70% accuracy, structured format)

Course Overview

This tutorial demonstrates a systematic two-stage knowledge distillation pipeline: Stage 1 - SFT (Format Learning):

Generate training data with consistent output formatting
Train student model to internalize structured response patterns
Demonstrate format learning without explicit instructions

Stage 2 - RFT (Accuracy Improvement):

Build reward system based on answer correctness
Apply reinforcement learning to improve reasoning within learned format
Show accuracy gains while maintaining consistent structure

Why This Two-Stage Approach Works:

SFT: Excels at learning structural patterns and making them default behavior
RFT: Excels at optimizing content quality through reward-based learning
Together: Create models that are both well-formatted AND more accurate

Run this tutorial interactively in Google Colab: Open Notebook

Chapter 1: Environment Setup

Requirements:

Fireworks AI account with API access
Basic familiarity with fine-tuning concepts
Understanding of train/test splits for valid evaluation

# Install required packages
!pip install --upgrade fireworks-ai

# Core imports for the entire course
from fireworks import LLM, Dataset
import fireworks
import pandas as pd
import json
import re
import time
import random
from typing import List, Dict, Optional
import os

API Configuration

# Get your Fireworks AI API Key at https://app.fireworks.ai/settings/users/api-keys
os.environ['FIREWORKS_API_KEY'] = 'your-fireworks-api-key'

# Test SDK connection
llm = LLM(model="llama4-maverick-instruct-basic", deployment_type="serverless")

response = llm.chat.completions.create(
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Hello! Can you help me learn about AI?"}]
)

print("SDK Connection Test:")
print(response.choices[0].message.content)

What’s Happening Here:

Fireworks SDK: Simplified interface for model deployment and fine-tuning
Serverless Models: Pre-deployed models you can use immediately
API Key: Authenticates your requests and tracks usage

Chapter 2: Dataset Preparation and Analysis

Why GSM8K?

Standard Benchmark: Widely used for evaluating mathematical reasoning
Clear Evaluation: Numerical answers are easy to check for correctness
Appropriate Difficulty: Challenging enough to demonstrate knowledge transfer

Why We Need Proper Train/Test Splits Critical for Valid Evaluation: Using the same data for training and testing leads to inflated results that don’t reflect real-world performance. GSM8K provides standard splits that enable fair comparison with other research.

Load GSM8K Dataset

# Load both splits
splits = {
    'train': 'main/train-00000-of-00001.parquet',
    'test': 'main/test-00000-of-00001.parquet'
}

# Load train set
df_train = pd.read_parquet("hf://datasets/openai/gsm8k/" + splits["train"])

# Load test set
df_test = pd.read_parquet("hf://datasets/openai/gsm8k/" + splits["test"])

Dataset Statistics:
  • Train size: 7473
  • Test size: 1319
  • Total: 8792

Example GSM8K Problem:

{
    'question': 'Natalia sold clips to 48 of her friends in April, and then she sold half as many clips in May. How many clips did Natalia sell altogether in April and May?',
    'answer': 'Natalia sold 48/2 = <<48/2=24>>24 clips in May.\nNatalia sold 48+24 = <<48+24=72>>72 clips altogether in April and May.\n#### 72',
}

Why This Format Matters: The #### 18 format provides the ground truth answer we need for automated evaluation. We’ll extract this pattern to check model correctness. Process Dataset for Training and Evaluation

gsm8k_train_problems = []
for idx, row in df_train.iterrows():
    answer_match = re.search(r'#### (\d+)', row['answer'])
    ground_truth = answer_match.group(1) if answer_match else None

    if ground_truth:
        gsm8k_train_problems.append({
            "question": row['question'],
            "ground_truth": ground_truth,
            "full_solution": row['answer']
        })

gsm8k_test_problems = []
for idx, row in df_test.iterrows():
    answer_match = re.search(r'#### (\d+)', row['answer'])
    ground_truth = answer_match.group(1) if answer_match else None

    if ground_truth:
        gsm8k_test_problems.append({
            "question": row['question'],
            "ground_truth": ground_truth,
            "full_solution": row['answer']
        })

Chapter 3: Model Setup

Deploy Your Student Model

Model Selection: We’re using Qwen2.5-7B as our student model because:

Right Size: Large enough to learn complex patterns, small enough to be efficient
Strong Base: Pre-trained on diverse data including mathematical content
Cost-Effective: Significantly cheaper to run than larger models

# Deploy the base model for training and inference
base_llm = LLM(
    model="qwen2p5-7b",
    id="kd-base-model",  # Unique identifier
    deployment_type="on-demand",  # Scales automatically
    min_replica_count=0,
    max_replica_count=1
)

# Apply the deployment configuration
base_llm.apply()

Testing Baseline Model Behavior

# Test our baseline model on a sample problem
sample_question = "Janet's ducks lay 16 eggs per day. She eats three for breakfast every morning and bakes muffins for her friends every day with four. She sells the remainder at the farmers' market daily for $2 per fresh duck egg. How much does she make every day at the farmers' market?"

baseline_response = base_llm.chat.completions.create(
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": sample_question}],
    max_tokens = 10000
)

baseline_response.choices[0].message.content

Expected Baseline Behavior: Unstructured, verbose responses without consistent formatting patterns. Actual Baseline Model Outputs: Output 1:

Janet has 16 eggs per day. She eats 3 into breakfast, leaving her with 16-3 = 13 eggs. Out of these, she uses 4 for her muffin recipes, which results in 13-4 = 9 eggs left. Selling each of these leftover eggs at $2, she makes 9*2 = $18 per day at the market.

print(9*2)

Output 2:

Janet starts with 16 ducks eggs. Each day, she eats 3 for breakfast and uses 4 for her muffins, which totals 7 eggs.

The remainder she sells. So, the remaining eggs are 16 - 7. She sells these at $2 per egg.

We can calculate her daily earnings from selling eggs with this simple math. I will write a python code snippet to perform this calculation.
```python
# Number of eggs laid by ducks daily
laying_daily = 16

# Number of eggs used by Janet and her friends
eggs_for_use = 3 + 4

# Number of eggs remaining to sell
remaining_eggs = laying_daily - eggs_for_use

#_price per fresh duck egg
price_per_egg = 2

# Daily earnings by selling the remaining eggs
daily_cool = remaining_eggs * price_per_egg
print(daily_cool)

output
20

Janet sells the remainder eggs at the farmers' market, making \$20 per day.

Chapter 4: Stage 1 - Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT)

Generate Formatted Training Data with Teacher Model

Why Use a Teacher Model

The Knowledge Transfer Principle Rather than learning math reasoning from scratch, we’ll have a powerful model (DeepSeek-V3) solve problems step-by-step, then train our small model to mimic those high-quality solutions. Why DeepSeek-V3:

Strong mathematical reasoning (>90% accuracy on GSM8K)
Clear step-by-step explanations that provide good learning examples
Consistent output format when given proper instructions
Cost-effective for generating training data (no deployment required)
Available as serverless model on Fireworks AI platform

Two-Stage Data Strategy: We’ll generate one high-quality dataset from our teacher model and adapt it for both training stages:

Stage 1 (SFT): Use teacher responses as training targets to learn format patterns
Stage 2 (RFT): Use the same problems with ground truth labels for reward-based learning

Defining Our Target Format

Why Structured Output?

Consistency: Every response follows the same pattern
Parseability: Easy to extract answers programmatically
Debugging: Clear separation of reasoning and results
Production Ready: Reliable format for downstream applications
Unique: Different from typical model outputs

TARGET_FORMAT_EXAMPLE = """
[WORK]
1. Janet's ducks lay 16 eggs per day
2. She eats 3 eggs for breakfast  
3. She uses 4 eggs for muffins
4. Remaining eggs: 16 - 3 - 4 = 9 eggs
5. Revenue: 9 eggs × $2/egg = $18
[/WORK]

[RESULT]
18
[/RESULT]
"""

Teaching the Teacher Model Our Format

Strategy: We’ll use a system prompt to teach our teacher model (DeepSeek-V3) to use our desired format, then capture those formatted responses as training data.

# System prompt that teaches the format
SYSTEM_PROMPT = """You are a math tutor. When solving problems, always structure your response in this exact format:

[WORK]
Show your step-by-step reasoning here. Work through the problem systematically, showing calculations and logic clearly.
[/WORK]

[RESULT]
Put only the final numerical answer here (no units, no extra text)
[/RESULT]

Follow this format exactly for every math problem."""

# Test the teacher model with our format instructions
sample_question = "Janet's ducks lay 16 eggs per day. She eats three for breakfast every morning and bakes muffins for her friends every day with four. She sells the remainder at the farmers' market daily for $2 per fresh duck egg. How much does she make every day at the farmers' market?"

messages = [{"role": "system", "content": SYSTEM_PROMPT}, {"role": "user", "content": sample_question}]

teacher_llm = LLM(model="deepseek-v3", deployment_type="serverless")

teacher_response = teacher_llm.chat.completions.create(
    messages=messages
)

teacher_response.choices[0].message.content

Actual teacher model response:

[WORK]
1. Janet's ducks lay 16 eggs per day.
2. She eats 3 eggs for breakfast daily.
3. She uses 4 eggs for baking muffins daily.
4. Total eggs used or consumed: \(3 + 4 = 7\)
5. Eggs remaining for sale: \(16 - 7 = 9\)
6. Price per egg: \$2
7. Daily earnings at the farmers' market: \(9 \times 2 = 18\)
[/WORK]

[RESULT]
18
[/RESULT]

Generating High-Quality Training Data

The Process:

Take problems from GSM8K training set
Have teacher model solve them using our format
Verify teacher got the right answer
Create training examples from successful solutions

def extract_answer_from_result_tags(response: str) -> str:
    """Extract answer from [RESULT] tags"""
    result_match = re.search(r'\[RESULT\](.*?)\[/RESULT\]', response, re.DOTALL)
    if result_match:
        return result_match.group(1).strip()
    return None

def generate_sft_training_data(train_problems_sample):
    """Generate training data using teacher model with format instructions"""

    sft_dataset = []
    successful_examples = 0

    for i, problem in enumerate(train_problems_sample):

        # Get teacher response with format instructions
        messages = [{"role": "system", "content": SYSTEM_PROMPT}, {"role": "user", "content": problem["question"]}]

        teacher_llm = LLM(model="deepseek-v3", deployment_type="serverless")

        teacher_response_obj = teacher_llm.chat.completions.create(
            messages=messages
        )

        teacher_response = teacher_response_obj.choices[0].message.content

        # Check if teacher got the right answer
        teacher_answer = extract_answer_from_result_tags(teacher_response)

        # Only include if teacher got the answer right AND used proper format
        if teacher_answer == problem["ground_truth"] and "[WORK]" in teacher_response and "[RESULT]" in teacher_response:
            # Don't include system prompt in training data so model learns
            # that the format should be followed even when not in system prompt
            training_example = {
                "messages": [
                    {"role": "user", "content": problem["question"]},
                    {"role": "assistant", "content": teacher_response}
                ]
            }
            sft_dataset.append(training_example)
            successful_examples += 1

    return sft_dataset, successful_examples

random.seed(42)
sampled_problems = random.sample(gsm8k_train_problems, 6000)

# Generate SFT training data
sft_training_data, successful_count = generate_sft_training_data(sampled_problems)

Actual result:

Generated 5700 high-quality training examples
Teacher success rate: 5700/6000 examples

Why Use a Teacher Model When We Already Have Answers? You might be wondering: “Wait, the GSM8K dataset already has the correct answers. Why do we need a teacher model to generate new ones?” Great question! This tutorial uses GSM8K because it provides a controlled environment where we can verify our teacher model’s accuracy. But in real-world applications, you typically don’t have the correct answers for your specific domain. The Knowledge Distillation Advantage The Pattern: In production, you have:

Questions/Inputs: Your domain-specific problems
No Perfect Answers: No ground truth responses
Solution: Use a powerful teacher model to create accurate high-quality training data

Real-World Knowledge Distillation Use Cases

Common Scenarios Where You Need Teacher Models

1. Legal Document Analysis

Challenge: No ground truth for contract clause interpretation
Teacher Solution: Use teacher models to generate expert-level legal analyses

2. Code Review Automation

Challenge: No perfect code review comments for your codebase
Teacher Solution: Use teacher models to generate code review insights

4. Customer Support Chatbot

Challenge: No ideal responses for company-specific questions
Teacher Solution: Use teacher models for customer service responses

6. Content Moderation

Challenge: No labeled decisions for edge-case content
Teacher Solution: Use teacher models to generate moderation reasoning and decisions

Popular Open Source Teacher Models

Kimi K2: Great general purpose model, especially for agentic use cases.
Qwen3 Coder 480B: Strong coding model, especially for one-off coding tasks.
Qwen3 235B (instruct): Good general purpose model. Has strong world knowledge for tasks like classification.
Qwen3 235B (thinking): Good reasoning model for agentic tasks and tasks that require multi-step planning.
Open AI GPT OSS 120B: OpenAI’s open-weight model, with strong reasoning and tool use capabilities. Runs efficiently on single 80GB GPU and achieves near-parity with o4-mini on core reasoning benchmarks.
DeepSeek V3: Powerful MoE model with 671B parameters (37B active) that rivals GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. Strong performance in math, coding, and reasoning tasks.
DeepSeek R1: Open-source reasoning model that rivals OpenAI o1. Trained using pure reinforcement learning. Shows explicit chain-of-thought reasoning process and excels at complex mathematical and logical problems.

Uploading Training Data to Fireworks

# Save to file first
dataset_filename = "kd_sft_dataset.jsonl"
with open(dataset_filename, 'w') as f:
    for example in sft_training_data:
        f.write(json.dumps(example) + '\n')

# Upload to Fireworks
dataset = Dataset.from_file(dataset_filename)
dataset.sync()

SFT Training Configuration

Supervised Fine-Tuning Job:

Model: Qwen2.5 7B
Dataset: dataset (Your uploaded dataset)
Epochs: 5-8 (format learning needs repetition)
Learning Rate: 1e-5

Critical Parameters for Format Learning:

Higher Learning Rate: Needed to override existing response patterns
More Epochs: Format internalization requires repetition
Larger Model: 3B+ has capacity to learn complex structural patterns
No System Prompts in Training: Teaches default behavior, not instruction-following

Running the SFT Training Job

# Create fine-tuning job
job = base_llm.create_supervised_fine_tuning_job(
    display_name="kd-sft-job",
    dataset_or_id=dataset.id,
    epochs=3,
    learning_rate=1e-5
)

job.wait_for_completion()

Deploying the Fine-Tuned Model

sft_llm = LLM(
    model=job.output_model,
    deployment_type="on-demand",
    id="kd-sft-model",
    min_replica_count=0,
    max_replica_count=1
)
sft_llm.apply()

Chapter 5: Evaluating SFT Results

Testing Format Learning Success

The Critical Test: Can our fine-tuned model use the target format WITHOUT being explicitly told to do so?

sample_question = "Janet's ducks lay 16 eggs per day. She eats three for breakfast every morning and bakes muffins for her friends every day with four. She sells the remainder at the farmers' market daily for $2 per fresh duck egg. How much does she make every day at the farmers' market?"

sft_llm_response = sft_llm.chat.completions.create(
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": sample_question}]
)

sft_llm_response.choices[0].message.content

Actual output:

Okay, let's see. Janet's ducks lay 16 eggs each day. She eats 3 eggs every morning for breakfast. Then she bakes muffins and uses 4 eggs for that. The rest she sells at the market for $2 each. So, I need to calculate how much she makes daily from the sales.

First, I'll find out how many eggs she has after eating and baking. So, total eggs laid per day is 16. She eats 3, so 16 - 3 = 13 eggs left. Then she uses 4 eggs for muffins, so 13 - 4 = 9 eggs remaining.

Now, she sells these 9 eggs at $2 each. So, 9 eggs * $2 = $18. That should be her daily earnings from the market.

[WORK]
1. Total eggs laid per day: 16
2. Eggs eaten for breakfast: 3
3. Eggs used for muffins: 4
4. Eggs remaining after eating and baking: 16 - 3 - 4 = 9
5. Price per egg: $2
6. Total earnings from farmers' market: 9 * 2 = 18
[/WORK]

[RESULT]
18
[/RESULT]

SUCCESS! SFT taught the model to automatically use the target format! This demonstrates how SFT can make structural patterns the model’s default behavior. If your format learning is incomplete, consider:

More training examples (aim for 1000+)
Higher learning rate (try 1e-4)
More epochs (try 5-8)
Verify training data format consistency

Now that we have consistent, structured responses, we can focus purely on improving the quality of the content within that structure. This is where Stage 2 (RFT) shines - optimizing for correctness while maintaining our learned formatting.

Understanding SFT’s Strengths and Limitations

Strengths demonstrated

Consistent output formatting
No system prompts needed
Internalized behavior patterns

Limitations to address

Accuracy may not improve dramatically
Only mimics teacher, doesn’t generalize
No feedback loop for corrections

Chapter 6: Stage 2 - Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT)

Now that our model consistently uses the [WORK] and [RESULT] format automatically (without being told), we can apply RFT to improve the accuracy of answers within that structure.

Why Add Reinforcement Learning

Beyond Imitation: While SFT teaches the model to mimic the teacher’s style, RFT optimizes for correctness. The model learns to:

Prefer reasoning paths that lead to correct answers
Self-correct when making mistakes
Develop confidence in its mathematical reasoning

How RFT Works: Instead of just copying teacher responses, RFT gives the model a reward (+1) for correct answers and penalty (0) for wrong answers, encouraging the model to find its own path to the right solution. RFT Advantages with SFT Foundation:

Easy reward calculation from [RESULT] tags
Maintains learned formatting while optimizing correctness

Creating the RFT Dataset

Strategy: Reuse the same problems our teacher model solved correctly during SFT generation, but format them for reinforcement learning.

def create_rft_dataset_from_sft(sft_training_data, max_samples=1000):
    """
    Create RFT dataset by extracting problems from existing SFT dataset
    """

    rft_data = []
    problems_processed = 0

    for sft_example in sft_training_data:
        if problems_processed >= max_samples:
            break

        user_question = None
        teacher_response = None

        # Extract user question and teacher response from messages
        for message in sft_example["messages"]:
            if message["role"] == "user":
                user_question = message["content"]
            elif message["role"] == "assistant":
                teacher_response = message["content"]

        if user_question and teacher_response:
            # Extract ground truth from teacher's [RESULT] tags
            ground_truth = extract_answer_from_result_tags(teacher_response)

            if ground_truth:
                rft_example = {
                    "messages": [
                        {"role": "user", "content": user_question}
                    ],
                    "ground_truth": ground_truth
                }
                rft_data.append(rft_example)
                problems_processed += 1
    return rft_data

# Create RFT dataset from our existing SFT dataset
rft_training_data = create_rft_dataset_from_sft(sft_training_data, max_samples=1000)

# Save to file
dataset_filename = "kd_rft_dataset-1.jsonl"
with open(dataset_filename, 'w') as f:
    for example in rft_training_data:
        f.write(json.dumps(example) + '\n')

# Upload dataset to Fireworks
dataset = Dataset.from_file("kd_rft_dataset-1.jsonl")
dataset.sync()

This is what an RFT training data point looks like:

{"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "There are enough provisions in a castle to feed 300 people for 90 days. After 30 days, 100 people leave the castle. How many more days are left until all the food runs out?"}], "ground_truth": "90"}

Understanding Reward Kit and Evaluators

What is Reward Kit?

Reward Kit is currently being deprecated. Please check out our latest Reinforcement Fine-Tuning guide.

# Create a comprehensive evaluator for math problems

rft_evaluator_code = '''
import re
from reward_kit import reward_function
from reward_kit.models import EvaluateResult

@reward_function
def evaluate(messages: list[dict], **kwargs) -> EvaluateResult:
    """
    RFT Evaluator: Compare model answer with ground truth
    Optimized for [WORK]/[RESULT] format from SFT stage
    """

    # Get ground truth from dataset
    ground_truth_answer = kwargs.get('ground_truth')
    if not ground_truth_answer:
        return EvaluateResult(score=0.0, reason="No ground truth found in dataset")

    # Get the model's generated response (last message)
    model_response = messages[-1]["content"]

    # Extract model's answer using multiple methods
    model_answer = extract_model_answer(model_response)

    if not model_answer:
        return EvaluateResult(score=0.0, reason="No answer extracted from model response")

    # Clean and compare answers
    ground_truth_clean = clean_answer(ground_truth_answer)
    model_answer_clean = clean_answer(model_answer)

    if model_answer_clean == ground_truth_clean:
        return EvaluateResult(score=1.0, reason=f"Correct: {model_answer_clean}")
    else:
        return EvaluateResult(score=0.0, reason=f"Wrong: {model_answer_clean} vs {ground_truth_clean}")

def extract_model_answer(text: str) -> str:
    """Extract answer from model response, prioritizing our learned format"""

    # Method 1: [RESULT] tags (primary method for our SFT model)
    result_match = re.search(r'\\[RESULT\\](.*?)\\[/RESULT\\]', text, re.DOTALL)
    if result_match:
        return result_match.group(1).strip()

    # Method 2: \\boxed{} format (fallback)
    boxed_match = re.search(r'\\\\boxed\\{([^}]+)\\}', text)
    if boxed_match:
        return boxed_match.group(1).strip()

    # Method 3: Last significant number in text
    numbers = re.findall(r'\\b(\\d+(?:,\\d{3})*(?:\\.\\d+)?)\\b', text)
    if numbers:
        significant_numbers = [n for n in numbers if float(n.replace(',', '')) >= 1]
        if significant_numbers:
            return significant_numbers[-1]

    return None

def clean_answer(answer_str: str) -> str:
    """Clean and normalize answer"""
    if not answer_str:
        return ""

    # Remove whitespace, commas, dollar signs
    cleaned = re.sub(r'[,$\\s]', '', str(answer_str).strip())

    # Convert to int if whole number
    try:
        if '.' in cleaned:
            float_val = float(cleaned)
            if float_val.is_integer():
                return str(int(float_val))
            else:
                return str(float_val)
        else:
            return str(int(cleaned))
    except ValueError:
        return cleaned
'''

# Save the evaluator
rft_evaluator_filename = "kd-rft-evaluator.py"
with open(rft_evaluator_filename, 'w') as f:
    f.write(rft_evaluator_code)

Setting Up RFT Training (Manual Dashboard Configuration)

Due to the complexity of reinforcement learning setup, we’ll use the Fireworks dashboard for the final configuration steps.

Step 1: Upload the RFT Evaluator

Navigate to Evaluators
- Go to https://app.fireworks.ai/dashboard/evaluations
Create New Evaluator
- Click “Create Evaluator”
- Evaluator Name: kd-rft-evaluator
Configure Dataset
- Select “Select an existing dataset”
- Choose the kd-rft-dataset you uploaded earlier
Add Evaluator Code
- Choose “Start from scratch”
- Click “Next”
- In the code editor, delete any existing code
- Copy and paste the complete code from kd-rft-evaluator.py
Save Evaluator
- Click “Save Evaluator”
- Your evaluator is now ready for RFT training

Step 2: Create RFT Training Job

Navigate to Fine-Tuning
- Go to the Fine-Tuning tab in the dashboard
- Click “Fine-Tune a Model”
- Select “Reinforcement” tab
Configure Training Job Model Selection:
- Select your SFT-trained model
- Use job.output_model from your SFT job to obtain SFT model name (e.g., accounts/your-account/models/kd-sft-model)
Dataset:
- Select kd-rft-dataset from the dropdown
Evaluator:
- Select kd-rft-evaluator (the one you just created)
Training Settings:
- Rollout Settings: Leave as default values
- Model Output Name:
  - Option 1: Leave blank for auto-generated name
  - Option 2: Enter custom name (e.g., kd-rft-model)
- Other Hyperparameters: Leave as defaults
Launch Training
- Review your configuration
- Click “Create Job”
- Important: Note the output model name for evaluation later
Monitoring

Track progress in the dashboard’s Fine Tuning section.
Once the job status is Completed, you can deploy your model.

Deploying the Fine-Tuned Model

rft_llm = LLM(
    model="<rft-model-output-name>", # Replace <rft-model-output-name> with the model ID from your completed fine-tuning job
    deployment_type="on-demand",
    id="kd-rft-model",
    min_replica_count=0,
    max_replica_count=1
)
rft_llm.apply()

Chapter 7: Evaluate Complete Knowledge Distillation Pipeline

Now that we’ve completed our knowledge distillation pipeline, it’s time to evaluate our results. But first, we need robust evaluation tools that can handle the complexity of comparing different models fairly. Why We Need Sophisticated Evaluation Tools The Challenge: We now have models that may respond in different formats:

Baseline model: Natural language, inconsistent formatting
RFT model: Structured [WORK]/[RESULT] format

The Problem: Simple string matching won’t work because:

# These are all the same answer but look different:
response_1 = "The answer is 42 dollars"
response_2 = "[RESULT]\n42\n[/RESULT]"  
response_3 = "Therefore, the total is $42.00"
response_4 = "\\boxed{42}"

We need evaluation tools that can:

Extract answers from any response format
Normalize numbers (handle commas, decimals, currency)
Track multiple metrics (accuracy, extraction success)

Building Our Evaluation System Let’s build two essential functions that will power our model comparisons: Answer Extraction Engine

def extract_answer(text: str) -> Optional[str]:
    """
    Answer extraction that tries multiple methods
    """
    # Method 0: [RESULT] tags (primary method for our SFT model)
    result_match = re.search(r'\[RESULT\](.*?)\[/RESULT\]', text, re.DOTALL)
    if result_match:
        answer = result_match.group(1).strip()
        number = extract_number_from_text(answer)
        if number:
            return number

    # Method 1: <answer> tags
    answer_tag_match = re.search(r'<answer>\s*(.*?)\s*</answer>', text, re.IGNORECASE | re.DOTALL)
    if answer_tag_match:
        answer = answer_tag_match.group(1).strip()
        number = extract_number_from_text(answer)
        if number:
            return number

    # Method 2: \\boxed{} format
    boxed_match = re.search(r'\\boxed\{([^}]+)\}', text)
    if boxed_match:
        number = extract_number_from_text(boxed_match.group(1))
        if number:
            return number

    # Method 3: Last number in the entire text
    all_numbers = re.findall(r'\b(\d+(?:,\d{3})*(?:\.\d+)?)\b', text)
    if all_numbers:
        # Filter out small numbers that might be step numbers
        significant_numbers = [n for n in all_numbers if float(n.replace(',', '')) >= 1]
        if significant_numbers:
            return clean_number(significant_numbers[-1])

    # Method 4: "Therefore" or conclusion patterns
    conclusion_patterns = [
        r'[Tt]herefore,?\s+.*?(\d+(?:,\d{3})*(?:\.\d+)?)',
        r'[Ss]o,?\s+.*?(\d+(?:,\d{3})*(?:\.\d+)?)',
        r'[Tt]hus,?\s+.*?(\d+(?:,\d{3})*(?:\.\d+)?)',
        r'[Ii]n total,?\s+.*?(\d+(?:,\d{3})*(?:\.\d+)?)',
        r'[Aa]ltogether,?\s+.*?(\d+(?:,\d{3})*(?:\.\d+)?)',
    ]

    for pattern in conclusion_patterns:
        matches = re.findall(pattern, text)
        if matches:
            return clean_number(matches[-1])  # Take the last match

    # Method 5: "The answer is" patterns
    answer_is_patterns = [
        r'[Tt]he answer is\s+(\d+(?:,\d{3})*(?:\.\d+)?)',
        r'[Aa]nswer:\s*(\d+(?:,\d{3})*(?:\.\d+)?)',
        r'[Ff]inal answer:\s*(\d+(?:,\d{3})*(?:\.\d+)?)',
    ]

    for pattern in answer_is_patterns:
        match = re.search(pattern, text)
        if match:
            return clean_number(match.group(1))

    # Method 6: Numbers at the end of sentences
    sentences = text.split('.')
    for sentence in reversed(sentences[-3:]):  # Check last 3 sentences
        numbers = re.findall(r'\b(\d+(?:,\d{3})*(?:\.\d+)?)\b', sentence)
        if numbers:
            return clean_number(numbers[-1])

    return None

def extract_number_from_text(text: str) -> Optional[str]:
    """Extract the main number from a piece of text"""
    # Look for numbers, prioritizing larger ones
    numbers = re.findall(r'\b(\d+(?:,\d{3})*(?:\.\d+)?)\b', text)
    if numbers:
        return clean_number(numbers[-1])  # Take the last/most significant number
    return None

def clean_number(number_str: str) -> str:
    """Clean and normalize number string"""
    # Remove commas and extra whitespace
    cleaned = number_str.replace(',', '').strip()

    # Convert to int if it's a whole number
    try:
        if '.' in cleaned:
            float_val = float(cleaned)
            if float_val.is_integer():
                return str(int(float_val))
            else:
                return str(float_val)
        else:
            return str(int(cleaned))
    except ValueError:
        return cleaned

Evaluation System

def evaluate_model(MODEL, deployment_id, problems):
    """Evaluate model"""

    results = []
    correct = 0
    total = 0
    extraction_failures = 0

    for i in range(0, len(problems)):
      problem = problems[i]

      # Get model response
      llm = LLM(
        model=MODEL,
        deployment_type="on-demand",
        id=deployment_id  # The deployment ID that already exists
      )

      response = llm.chat.completions.create(
          messages=[{"role": "user", "content": problem["question"]}]
      )
      model_response = response.choices[0].message.content
      model_answer = extract_answer(model_response)  # Use answer extraction
      ground_truth = problem["ground_truth"]

      # Track extraction failures
      if model_answer is None:
          extraction_failures += 1

      # Check correctness (only if we extracted something)
      is_correct = model_answer == ground_truth if model_answer else False
      if is_correct:
          correct += 1
      total += 1

    accuracy = correct / total if total > 0 else 0

    return accuracy

Test Model Performance

base_accuracy = evaluate_model(
    "qwen2p5-7b",
    "kd-base-model",
    gsm8k_test_problems
)

rft_accuracy = evaluate_model(
    "<rft-model-output-name>", # Replace <rft-model-output-name> with the model ID from your completed fine-tuning job
    "kd_rft_model",
    gsm8k_test_problems
)

Actual Results Analysis

ACCURACY PROGRESSION:
Base Model:  52%
→ RFT:       70% (+18pp)
Total Gain:  +18 percentage point improvement

FORMAT COMPLIANCE:
SFT Model:  ~95% use [WORK]/[RESULT] format automatically  
RFT Model:  ~95% maintain format + higher accuracy

Course Summary and Key Takeaways

What We Demonstrated

1. SFT for Internalized Format Learning:

Training Strategy: Include format examples without system prompts in training data
Testing Strategy: No system prompts needed - format is internalized
Result: Model automatically uses [WORK]/[RESULT] structure as default behavior
Key Insight: SFT teaches “how to respond” by making patterns the model’s natural behavior

2. RFT for Accuracy Improvement:

Foundation: Builds on SFT model
Optimization: Reward-based learning improves content quality
Result: Significantly improves reasoning accuracy
Key Insight: RFT optimizes “what to respond with”

3. Two-Stage Pipeline Synergy:

Stage 1 (SFT): Establishes reliable, consistent response structure
Stage 2 (RFT): Optimizes content quality within that structure
Combined Result: Models that are both well-formatted AND accurate

Practical Applications

This knowledge distillation approach is valuable for:

API Integrations: Reliable output parsing + improved accuracy
Structured Reasoning Tasks: Clear thinking process + better results
Production Pipelines: Consistent format + higher quality content
Evaluation Systems: Easy answer extraction + improved performance
Cost Optimization: Small models with large model capabilities

Expected Resources

Cost: ~Costs apply for API calls, deployments and training jobs

Conclusion

This tutorial demonstrated how to systematically apply knowledge distillation using Fireworks AI to create models that combine the structural reliability of supervised learning with the performance optimization of reinforcement learning. Key Success Factors:

Clear separation of concerns: SFT for structure, RFT for accuracy
Consistent evaluation methodology: Test without system prompts to measure true learning
Building on foundations: RFT builds on SFT rather than starting from scratch
Quality training data: High teacher model accuracy and format consistency

The result is a compact, efficient model that maintains the reasoning capabilities and output structure of much larger models, making it suitable for production deployment at significantly lower cost and latency. Next Steps: Apply this methodology to your own domain-specific tasks by:

Defining appropriate outputs for your use case
Generating high-quality teacher demonstrations
Fine tuning
Evaluating performance improvements

This systematic approach to knowledge distillation enables you to create specialized, efficient models that retain the capabilities of their larger teachers while being practical for real-world deployment. Questions or feedback? Reach out to us on Discord.

​Course Overview

​Chapter 1: Environment Setup

​API Configuration

​Chapter 2: Dataset Preparation and Analysis

​Load GSM8K Dataset

​Chapter 3: Model Setup

​Deploy Your Student Model

​Testing Baseline Model Behavior

​Chapter 4: Stage 1 - Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT)

​Generate Formatted Training Data with Teacher Model

​Why Use a Teacher Model

​Defining Our Target Format

​Teaching the Teacher Model Our Format

​Generating High-Quality Training Data

​Real-World Knowledge Distillation Use Cases

​Common Scenarios Where You Need Teacher Models

​Popular Open Source Teacher Models

​Uploading Training Data to Fireworks

​SFT Training Configuration

​Running the SFT Training Job

​Deploying the Fine-Tuned Model

​Chapter 5: Evaluating SFT Results

​Testing Format Learning Success

​Understanding SFT’s Strengths and Limitations

​Chapter 6: Stage 2 - Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT)

​Why Add Reinforcement Learning

​Creating the RFT Dataset

​Understanding Reward Kit and Evaluators

​Setting Up RFT Training (Manual Dashboard Configuration)

​Step 1: Upload the RFT Evaluator

​Step 2: Create RFT Training Job

​Deploying the Fine-Tuned Model

​Chapter 7: Evaluate Complete Knowledge Distillation Pipeline

​Test Model Performance

​Actual Results Analysis

​Course Summary and Key Takeaways

​What We Demonstrated

​Practical Applications

​Expected Resources

​Conclusion

Course Overview

Chapter 1: Environment Setup

API Configuration

Chapter 2: Dataset Preparation and Analysis

Load GSM8K Dataset

Chapter 3: Model Setup

Deploy Your Student Model

Testing Baseline Model Behavior

Chapter 4: Stage 1 - Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT)

Generate Formatted Training Data with Teacher Model

Why Use a Teacher Model

Defining Our Target Format

Teaching the Teacher Model Our Format

Generating High-Quality Training Data

Real-World Knowledge Distillation Use Cases

Common Scenarios Where You Need Teacher Models

Popular Open Source Teacher Models

Uploading Training Data to Fireworks

SFT Training Configuration

Running the SFT Training Job

Deploying the Fine-Tuned Model

Chapter 5: Evaluating SFT Results

Testing Format Learning Success

Understanding SFT’s Strengths and Limitations

Chapter 6: Stage 2 - Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT)

Why Add Reinforcement Learning

Creating the RFT Dataset

Understanding Reward Kit and Evaluators

Setting Up RFT Training (Manual Dashboard Configuration)

Step 1: Upload the RFT Evaluator

Step 2: Create RFT Training Job

Deploying the Fine-Tuned Model

Chapter 7: Evaluate Complete Knowledge Distillation Pipeline

Test Model Performance

Actual Results Analysis

Course Summary and Key Takeaways

What We Demonstrated

Practical Applications

Expected Resources

Conclusion